AOSTA SHIPPING CO. LTD. v. OSL S.S. CORP., 350 Fed.Appx. 505 (2nd Cir. 2009)

AOSTA SHIPPING CO. LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OSL STEAMSHIP CORP., Defendant-Appellee, Zhangjiang Fareast International Shipping Agency Co. and Clear Water Shipping Limited, Defendants.

No. 09-0481-cv.United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
October 26, 2009.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Rakoff, J.).

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED,AND DECREED that the order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York beVACATED and REMANDED.

George Michael Chalos, Oyster Bay, NY, for Appellant.

Charles E. Murphy, New York, NY, for Appellee.

Present: GUIDO CALABRESI and RICHARD C. WESLEY, Circuit Judges.[*]

[*] The Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, was originally assigned to this panel by designation. Because Judge Rakoff issued the decision below, however, he has taken no part in the consideration of this appeal. The two remaining members of the panel, who are in agreement, have determined the matter See 28 U.S.C. § 46(d); Local Rule 0.14(2); see also United States v. Desimone, 140 F.3d 457 (2d Cir. 1998).

Page 506

SUMMARY ORDER
Plaintiff Aosta Shipping Co. Ltd. appeals a January 26, 2009 order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Rakoff, J.). While this appeal was sub judice, we decided The Shipping Corp. of India Ltd. v. Jaldhi Overseas Pte Ltd., 585 F.3d 58 (2d Cir. 2009), in which we overruled Winter Storm Shipping, Ltd. v. TPI, 310 F.3d 263 (2d Cir. 2002), and held that electronic fund transfers being processed by intermediary banks are no longer subject to attachment under Rule B. Accordingly, we VACATE the district court’s order andREMAND the matter for consideration in light of this recent decision.