No. 143.Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
January 14, 1935.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Suit in equity charging infringement of four United States patents. From a decree dismissing, on the defendant’s motion, the bill of complaint in so far as it relates to patent No. 1,194,752 and patent No. 1,782,123, the plaintiff appeals. Decree affirmed.
For the opinion below, see (D.C.) 6 F. Supp. 573.
Hammond Littell, of New York City (Edmund Quincy Moses, Nelson Littell, and Clarence M. Crews, all of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Emery, Booth, Varney Whittemore, of New York City (L.G. Miller, of New York City, of counsel), for appellees.
Page 683
Before MANTON, L. HAND, and SWAN, Circuit Judges.
SWAN, Circuit Judge.
The basis for the defendant’s motion and for the District Court’s dismissal of the bill of complaint as to patent No. 1,194,752 and patent No. 1,782,123 was the fact that the plaintiff had unreasonably neglected and delayed to file a disclaimer pursuant to the statute (35 USCA §§ 65, 71) with respect to certain claims of the two patents aforesaid which had been held invalid in another litigation against another defendant. The other litigation was Better Packages, Inc., v. L. Link Co., Inc., et al. (D.C.) 1 F. Supp. 132, and the opinion of this court on appeal from the final decree therein is handed down herewith. 74 F.2d 679. The decision of that case necessarily governs this.
The decree herein is affirmed.