Sean FELDER, Plaintiff-Appellant, Curtis Robinson, Witness, Plaintiff, v. McROBERTS PROTECTIVE AGENCY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 06-5394-cv.United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
February 29, 2008.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Lewis A. Kaplan, Judge).

AFTER ARGUMENT AND UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBYORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED.

Sean Felder, pro se, New York, NY.

Felice B. Ekelman, Jackson Lewis LLP, New York, NY, for Defendant-Appellee.

PRESENT: JOSÉ A. CABRANES, ROSEMARY S. POOLER, ROBERT D. SACK, Circuit Judges.

SUMMARY ORDER
Plaintiff-appellant Sean Felder appeals pro se from a September 12, 2006 order of the District Court granting summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee McRoberts Protective Agency and dismissing Felder’s complaint with prejudice. Felder alleges that defendant-appellee, his former employer, unlawfully terminated his employment and otherwise discriminated against him on the basis of race. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts and the procedural history of the case.

We review a district court’s grant of summary judgment de novo, construing the evidence in the record in the light most favorable to the appellant and drawing all inferences in the appellant’s favor. See, e.g., Jeffreys v. City of New York, 426 F.3d 549, 553 (2d Cir. 2005). Reviewing the record and the relevant law, we detect no error in the District Court’s September 12, 2006 order or the Magistrate Judge’s August 3, 2006 report and recommendation.

Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the District Court, substantially for the reasons stated in the District Court’s September 12, 2006 order and the Magistrate Judge’s August 3, 2006 report and recommendation.