The HENRIETTA MILLS, Appellant, v. James J. HOEY, Individually and as Collector of Internal Revenue for the Second Collection District of New York, Appellee. BEAVER MILLS, Appellant, v. James J. HOEY, Individually, and etc., Appellee. CLYDE FABRICS, Inc., Appellant, v. James J. HOEY, Individually, and etc., Appellee. MARTEL MILLS CORPORATION, Appellant, v. James J. HOEY, Individually, and etc., Appellee.

Nos. 189, 186, 188, 187.Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
January 17, 1936.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

Reversing decree 12 F. Supp. 61.

See, also, E. Regensburg Sons v. Higgins, 79 F.2d 516.

Sullivan Cromwell, of New York City (David W. Peck, Francis H. Baldy, and John F. Dooling, Jr., all of New York City, of counsel), for appellants.

Frank J. Wideman, Asst. Atty. Gen., James W. Morris, Sewall Key, and Andrew W. Sharpe, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen. (F.W.H. Adams, U.S. Atty., Francis H. Horan and Edward J. Ennis, Asst. U.S. Attys., and William F. Young, Sp. Asst. to U.S. Atty., all of New York City, of counsel), for appellees.

Before MANTON, SWAN, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Decree reversed, and cause remanded to the District Court, with directions to enter a decree enjoining collection of the tax. An appropriate order shall be entered directing the repayment to the plaintiff of any cash, bonds, or funds which have been

Page 1012

impounded or deposited pendente lite in conformity with the order of the court below. Rickert Rice Mills, Inc., v. Fontenot, 56 S.Ct. 374, 80 L.Ed. ___, January 13, 1936.

Tagged:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *