WEINSTOCK v. WALKER, 331 Fed.Appx. 101 (2nd Cir. 2009)


Audrey WEINSTOCK Executrix for the Estate of Israel Weinstock, Plaintiff-Appellant,

Page 102

Israel Weinstock, Plaintiff, v. Jack WALKER, Kaminetzer Yeshiva of Jerusalem, David J. Doyaga, as Trustee of the Estate of In re Handler, Defendants-Appellees, Emmerich Handler, Defendant.

No. 06-2916-cv.United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
August 27, 2009.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Amon, J.).

ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is hereby ORDERED,ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the judgment of the District Court be and hereby is AFFIRMED.

Robert S. Catz, Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Wayne Greenwald, Wayne Greenwald P.C., New York, NY, for Defendant-Appellee Jack Walker.

Present JON O. NEWMAN and ROBERT A. KATZMANN, Circuit Judges, and DAVID G. TRAGER,[*] District Judge.

[*] The Honorable David G. Trager of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.

SUMMARY ORDER
Plaintiff-appellant Audrey Weinstock appeals from an order of the district court (Amon, Judge) dated May 30, 2006, adopting the bankruptcy court’s (Craig, Bankruptcy Judge) proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, and dismissing this action. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the facts, procedural history, and specification of issues on appeal.

After having reviewed Weinstock’s contentions on appeal and the record of proceedings below, we affirm for substantially the same reasons stated by the district court in its memorandum and order of May 30, 2006. We have considered all of Weinstock’s arguments and find them to be without merit.

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court isAFFIRMED.

Page 761